Wednesday, April 8, 2020
Greenspan Essays - Edward Greenspan, Massey College, Toronto
  Greenspan    Greenspan - The Case For The Defence In-Depth Review  My fascination with the Judicial System Structure of today's   society was furthered and strengthened after reading and analyzing the   works of Edward Greenspan.  This superbly written biography recollecting past cases and   important events in Greenspan's life allowed myself, the reader, to   learn more about Jurisprudence and the Criminal Code. The entire   casebook revolves around several main themes including the balance of   Positive & Natural influences in the courtroom, whether a lawyer's   consience intervenes with his duty as a counsellor, and the alarming   rate of perjury occuring in front of the juries. To be more concise   and clear to the point, Greenspan's book is a diary of controversial   and beneficial issues which have hovered around our criminal courts   and will continue to plague and pester them for years to come. By   observing and understanding certain issues presented in his book,   I was able to comprehend what type of person Greenspan is, what he   believes in, what he represents and what he would do for his   profession.  The wheels of Jurisprudence are always turning, and I came to   realise how Greenspan worked and bargained for his status in the   country to be solidified. This book also flourished with innovative   situations pertaining to the most diversified of criminal charges, to   the most uncanny regions of law ever dealt. It was this thorough look   at Greenspan's life which impressed this reviewer the most.  It was quite clear that after the fourth page, I came upon the   conclusion that this casebook would create a most influential reaction   to anyone who had displayed any interest towards our Law system in   general. Part One of the novel, No Little Clients, presents the reader   with the author's proposed thesis. His ambition is to defend innocent   people accused of crimes. Whether they are innocent or guilty without   being proven guilty is irrelevant to Mr. Greenspan. A lawyer's   consience must not be his deciding factor when advising or counselling   a client. This viewpoint is elaborated in Part Two (Not Above The   Fray) and explained frivolously by Greenspan himself. Throughout the   entire novel, the theme bends and curves itself around different and   unavoidable situations, but retains its original meaning that no one   is guilty until proven so. Greenspan refers to this phrase countless   times and explains to the reader that he will not allow his moral   beliefs to conlfict with the path of justice (delicately and   persuasively explained by both Greenspand and the co-author, George   Jonas in Parts Four, Five and Six of the novel).  Chapter 13, Playing God, emphatically displays Greenspan's   concern with the treatment of his clients and the decision to push the   client until he can make a decision that is in favour with the lawyer   himself. The significance of this chapter is that the reader detects   the amount of responsibility and endurance is required in order to   become a successful pawn of the judicial system. At this point,   Greenspan's thesis huddles itself around the principle of being a   Pawn of the System and only serving the system without prejudice and   socialistic conflicts.  The authors begin their novel with several different themes which   branch out and eventually combine. Walking The High Wire is an   excellent chapter which focuses on the effects of intended falsehoods   employed by the prosecution. When Greenspan takes on a case where the   courtroom is changed into a stage for the benefit of a woman who   allegedly is raped by his client, it is later realised that through   careful investigation and newly discovered evidence, can the truth be   used to assist the defendant in being acquitted. In the chapter And   Nothing But The Truth, the author presents a situation where even   those who enforce the law may lie to obtain a conviction of an   innocent person. When two police officers re-create a false scene for   the jury, the reader begins to understand why the author ponders upon   different moral questions and creates circumstantial, yet fruitful   answers.  Like a detective fiction novel, Greenspan proves without a doubt   that there is more than meets the eye in accepting and defending a   client. As witnessed in the chapter Hi Mom, Guess Who's In Jail, the   reader learns about how the media and police almost influence a jury    
Subscribe to:
Comments (Atom)